|
|
|
Why the project
|
|
Internal and external
economic conditions have had a significant impact on rural,
resource-dependent communities in Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Montana.
|
|
Federal resource management
decisions - including federal legislation, environmental regulations, and
federal court decisions - have had both intended and unintended
consequences.
|
|
|
|
Since 1989, 123 mills have
closed and more than 13,000 primary mill and wood jobs have been eliminated
in the Inland Northwest region.
|
|
From 1993 through 1998, the
Federal government spent over $1 billion addressing similar problems in
western Oregon, western Washington and Northern California. Eastside
impacts are significant, but the area has received little to no economic
assistance.
|
|
|
|
Why the partnership
|
|
Growing recognition that a
region-wide effort is needed to address the deep-rooted problems.
|
|
History of working together
(Washington, Oregon and California) through the regional CERT process
|
|
|