|
1
|
- Regional Action to Support Local Solutions
- in Oregon, Washington, Idaho and Montana
|
|
2
|
- INEAS Purpose, Status, Outcomes, Guiding Principles
- Regional Socio-Economic Conditions
- Issues Assessment
- Phase 3 Action:
- Phase 3 Goals & Team
- Key Strategy Areas
- Business Clusters & Trends
- Priority Issues & Actions
- Implementation Options
- Next Steps
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Inland Northwest is highly dependent on natural resource jobs (14% vs.
6% nationally)
- Federal land policies have disproportionately significant impacts (some
counties 75%+ federal ownership)
- Decline in timber harvest contributes significantly to socio-economic
conditions
- 26 Inland NW counties in lowest national rankings on virtually every
socio-economic indicator
- Proximate cause between federal resource policy decisions and the
region’s economic distress
|
|
5
|
- Four-state partnership formed; supported by Governors Kitzhaber,
Kempthorne, Locke, Martz
- Received three grants from EDA with financial support from the four
states and ATNI
- Phase 1: Socio-economic
Assessment P
- Phase 2: Issues
Assessment; Strategy Develop’t P
- Phase 3:
Strategy Refinement; Key Actions & Performance Measures;
Organization Options; Funding Requests
- Phase 4: Implement and Realize
Results
|
|
6
|
- Business development:
diversification, expansion, new business start-up and
recruitment.
- Living wage jobs, a skilled workforce and diverse economic base to create
new wealth.
- Adequate infrastructure, funded by public and private investment.
- Local capacity and leadership to achieve good planning and restore
economic vitality.
|
|
7
|
- Grassroots awareness and support for INEAS process.
- A Regional Economic Adjustment Strategy and credible organizational
capability - supporting local priority projects and regional
collaboration.
- Congressional support a federal economic adjustment package.
- Increased national awareness and visibility for a region that has been a
major contributor to the overall economic prosperity of the country.
|
|
8
|
- Focus on Consequences, Not Policies.
INEAS does not take positions on natural resource policy
debates. We seek to address the
socio-economic impacts of those policies on the region.
- Regional Cooperation. We are stronger as a region than we are as
individual communities, tribes or states. Economic development in the
Inland Northwest will be most successful as a regional effort between
the four states and affiliated tribes.
- Local Focus. Locally-driven strategies and project priorities,
consistent with local values, will be respected and encouraged.
|
|
9
|
- Community Leadership. Communities can improve their vitality, provided
they have sufficient local leadership to adapt and embrace change.
Supporting and investing in local capacity is key to the success of the
Strategy.
- Technical Assistance. Information and technical assistance will help
make community efforts more strategic and effective.
- Inclusiveness. The more people and perspectives involved in a decision,
the greater the public acceptance of that decision, and the more likely
it will address all concerns.
|
|
10
|
- Economic Perspective. Economies happen on a regional, national, and
global basis, based on market forces.
Communities that work together are likely to be more competitive
in business and economic development.
- Public-Private Partnerships. Most jobs are created in the private
sector, and job creation is a long-term process. Communities provide the
infrastructure and the ingredients of financial, human, natural, and
social capital that help make businesses flourish.
- Livability. Community development means more than job creation; it
includes actions and policies that add to the vitality, wealth, and
livability of the community.
|
|
11
|
- Economic Vitality Index
- Timber Industry Trends
- Agriculture Challenges
|
|
12
|
- Regional economic distress
- Federal government influence on region:
- Key economic sectors (timber, mining, ranching/ag, tourism)
- Chronology of federal resource management and trade decisions, 1980-2000
- 109+ endangered or threatened species
- Public policy by litigation
- Many existing plans, but disconnected efforts
|
|
13
|
- Measures economic health of Inland NW counties, using 6 classes of
socio-economic indicators:
- Population trends in each county (% change, age)
- Income trends (PCI, public assistance, etc.)
- Labor force (unemployment, labor force participation)
- Economic base (value-added, exports, timber, grazing)
- Federal government influence (PILT, land ownership)
- Tribal indicators (pop’n, unempl., poverty, labor force)
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
- Apples, Milk, Potatoes, Beef Cattle, Wheat
- Strongest commodity is beef cattle
- Prospects are grim for 3 commodities - apples, milk, and potatoes
- Prices for some commodities lower than in early 1980s; production costs
rising
- Shipping costs increasing (fuel, loss of rail lines, challenges for
ports)
|
|
21
|
- Analysis of local needs & issues
- - Reviewed 164 local/regional
plans
- Magnitude and types of needs
- Identification of common themes
- Analysis of regional differences
- Analysis of barriers
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Phase 3 Goals
- Phase 3 Team
- Key Strategy Areas
- Business Clusters & Trends
- Priority Issues & Actions
- Implementation Options
- Next Steps
|
|
25
|
- Prepare, secure and implement a federal economic adjustment package
- Grass roots awareness and support
- Leadership support within the region and nationally for a federal
economic adjustment package
- Regional consensus for an organizational framework that is credible and
fair (e.g., regional commission)
|
|
26
|
- Identify and implement Region-wide action based on:
- Findings from the socio-economic assessment
- Existing regional and community-level strategic plans
- Locally determined needs and priorities
- Stakeholder input
- Existing best practices and lessons learned
- Multi-county/state market-driven initiatives
|
|
27
|
- Core Team
- 1 rep from ea. state, ATNI
- Consulting Team
- Steering Committee
- 3-4 reps from ea. state, ATNI
- Advisory Committee
- Invited key players to assist with Strategy Work Teams, Actions, Perf
Measures
- Stakeholders
- Implementation Partners, Funders (Public, Private)
|
|
28
|
- Industry Development
- Business Development
- Infrastructure Investments
- Community Capacity-building
- Workforce Development
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
- “Geographically-bounded concentration of similar, related, or
complementary businesses, with active channels for business
transactions, communications, and dialogue, that share specialized
infrastructure, labor markets, and services, and that are faced with
common opportunities and threats.”
|
|
31
|
- Data Used: NAICS (4-, 5-digit level), employment and revenue data
- Factors: high concentration of firms (Location Quotient, or LQ > 1),
high wages, faster growth in employment than U.S. averages for specific
industry
- Limitations: studies by different organizations using different methods
of analysis; exclusion of non-employer firms; no in-depth analysis in ID
|
|
32
|
- Wood-Based Products
- Agri-Food Products
- Experience Enterprise and Tourism
- Creative Enterprise
- Life Sciences
- Information Technology
|
|
33
|
- High Technology & Software
- Wood & Paper Products
- Food Processing & Agriculture
- Apparel & Sporting Goods
- Transportation Equipment
- Creative Services
|
|
34
|
- Recreation-Related
- Metals/Machinery
- Nursery Products
- Professional Services
- Biomedical
|
|
35
|
- Agriculture/Food Processing
- Forest Products
- Semiconductors
- Measuring Devices & Instruments
- Biotechnology
- Health Care
|
|
36
|
- International Trade
- Aerospace
- Aluminum
- Software/Internet
- Tourism
|
|
37
|
- Food Manufacturing
- Building Materials/Wood Products
- Computer & Electronics
- Transportation
- Information
- Construction/Heavy Equipment
- * Based on top-level analysis by Boise EDC
|
|
38
|
- Business Services and Support
- Veterinary Services
- Emerging Clusters:
- High Tech Instruments
- Outdoor Recreation Products
- * Based on top-level analysis by Boise EDC
|
|
39
|
- Ag & Food Processing
- Wood-Based Products & Building Materials
- Info Tech, Electronics & Data Services
- Recreation & Tourism
- Biotechnology & Life Sciences
- Creative Enterprises
- Metals
|
|
40
|
- Farming, Ranching, Nursery
- Milling & Packing, Primary Processing
- Malt Beverages, Wineries & Bottled Drinks
- Prepared Meats, Fruits/Veg’s, Cheese, Processed Foods/Groceries, Baked
Goods
- Refrigeration, Warehousing/Dist’n, Transp’n
- Machinery/Equip, Repair, Utensils, Research
- Wholesale, Retail, Restaurants, Exporting
|
|
41
|
- Logging, Millwork, Planing, Log Imports
- Veneer, Plywood, Engineered Products
- Paper, Structural Parts, Flooring, Boxes, Posts & Poles, Log Homes,
Pulp
- Prefab Homes, Furniture, Cabinets
- Machinery, CAD/CAM, Architects, Paints/Finishes
- Nurseries, Plant & Forest Management Services, Research, Pest
Biocontrol, Irrigation
- Wholesale, Dist’n, Retail, Finance, Trans’n
|
|
42
|
- Hardware, Software, Communicatn’s Equip
- Measuring/Controlling Devices, Medical Instr., Search & Navigation
Equip, Musical Instruments
- Semiconductors, Electronic Components
- Data Processing & Info Retrieval Services
- Engineering, Research, Testing Labs
- Machinery, Transformers, Broadcasting & Lighting Equip, Peripherals
- Facilities Management, Marketing, Distribution
|
|
43
|
- Hospitality: Lodging/RV, Restaurants, Casinos, Outfitters & Guides,
Visitor Info Services
- Products: Sporting Goods & Apparel, Galleries, Specialty Products
& Foods/Beverages
- Attractions: Museums, Amusement, Parks, Festivals, Trails, Nat’l
Forests, etc.
- Transp’n: Air, Car Rental, Coach, Rec Vehicles
- Promotion: Media, Tour Operators, Research
- Suppliers: Food & Bev, Furniture, Bed & Bath
|
|
44
|
- Medical & Pharmaceutical Products, Bioinformatics
- Medical Devices & Equipment, Diagnostics
- Agricultural Applications: Crop, Veterinary
- Environmental Applications
- Research (Commercial, University) & Clinical Trials
- Food Security & Hazardous Substances Detection
- Labs, Contract Manufacturing, Compliance
|
|
45
|
- Artists, Crafters, Entertainers, Writers, Performers, Musicians
- Production Companies, Entertain’t Venues
- Suppliers: Leather, Wool, Gems, Paper, Packaging, Fabrics, Lumber/Paint
- Equip: Kilns, Presses, Imaging, Sound, Software, Computers
- Services: Agents/Dealers, Ad Agencies, Studios, Printing, PR,
Platemaking, Binding, Graphics
|
|
46
|
- Mining & Processing
- Fabricated Metal Products
- Electroplating, Polishing, Anodizing
- Foundaries
- Tools, Machinery, Cutlery, Mining Equip
- Valves, Pipe & Fittings
- Ornamental Metal Work
|
|
47
|
- Decline in # of sawmills and mill jobs
- But NW production é
(consolid’n, move west)
- Loss of family farms (consolidation)
- Growth in tech sector, innovation, research
- Growth in trade, services & health care
- Growth in tourism, conservation sector
- More small businesses/entrepreneurs
- Aging population, newcomers seeking QOL
|
|
48
|
- Global economy
- Knowledge-based economy
- E-manufacturing
- Shift to services
- Small business dominance
- Demographics: aging population, ethnic diversity
- Focus on workforce & education
- By 2006, 2 workers departing for every 1 coming in
- Shortage of 10 million workers by 2008
- Quality of life: “Sense of Place”
- Regionalism
|
|
49
|
- Increasing % of growing companies globally integrated, pressing for open
international trade
- Increasingly digital and information driven
- Transformation to “e-businesses” that use Internet-platforms for
integrating entire operation
- Innovation leading to highly customized information, services, &
products (e.g., flexible production and mass customization; supply chain
management)
|
|
50
|
- Highly networked entrepreneurs who both collaborate & compete with
one another
- Growth areas characterized by high concentrations of knowledge workers
& an ability to attract & retain these workers
- Highly mobile & skilled labor force (“job churning”)
|
|
51
|
- The standard of living is increasing
- A “real” increase in the level of average household income is occurring
- The local tax base is meeting the escalating cost of government services
- Business and industry is investing more in the community than they are
“costing” the community
- (More than just “body counts” of jobs)
|
|
52
|
- Development of a skilled workforce
- Investment in the physical infrastructure
- Creation of new jobs at higher wages
- Improvement of the business environment
- Availability of marketable land and buildings
- Maintenance of the environment
- Improvement of the quality of life
- Marketing and promoting the region
|
|
53
|
- Economic Adjustment that “Connects the Dots” between Sectors,
Communities, Businesses and Markets
- Economic Development in Communities that Improves QOL
- Tangible Actions with Measurable Results
- Real economic growth (“Where’s the Beef?”)
- Focused Effort (Can’t be All Things to All People)
|
|
54
|
- Assistance for value-added industry processing, networking, marketing
- Competitiveness in global markets
- Rural-urban linkages
- Better understanding of regional competencies
- E-commerce training
|
|
55
|
- Assess industry assets/competitive position
- Link industry to research/higher ed
- Increase processing assistance
- Educate industry about global markets/opp’tys
- Form industry cluster development councils
- Increase collaboration between agencies, states and land grant
universities
- Link rural products to urban markets, urban services to rural markets
(i.e., distance learning, telemedicine)
- Focus on 3-4 industries as top priorities
|
|
56
|
- Entrepreneurial culture & training
- Equity capital
- Need for more focus on retention/expansion
- Rising costs of doing business (regulations, environment, power, labor,
insurance)
- Business cooperation/networks
- Effective tech transfer
|
|
57
|
- Increase business development training
- Enhance equity capital/loan funding options
- Foster business partnering/mentoring
- Support rural business incubators, tech transfer
- Emphasize retention/expansion vs. recruitment
- Address rising costs (regs, power, insurance)
- Publicize successes and outreach efforts
|
|
58
|
- Policy issues (scale of requirements, match funds required, etc.)
- “Disjointed incrementalism” in planning
- Telecomm/technology infrastructure
- Regional advocacy for infra needs
- Renewable energy infrastructure
- UCCs in Indian Country
- Short line railroads
|
|
59
|
- Develop regional inventory/assessment of needs (i.e., WA/OR CERT model)
- Assess economic impacts of infra needs on rural communities
- Enhance grant programs to leverage loan programs
- Pursue policy changes re. scale, match
- Evaluate regional transportation needs/linkages (highway, air, rail,
barge)
|
|
60
|
- Need for more capacity-building efforts
- Leadership training
- Decline of downtowns
- Understanding joint venture agreements
- Sustainability of projects
|
|
61
|
- Foster networking of practitioners – sharing successes and best
practices
- Develop “menu” of assessment products
- Provide assistance for community-based, market-driven planning
- Develop & deliver “just in time” capacity training as needed
- Provide methods/models for monitoring and tracking results
|
|
62
|
- Lack of health insurance/benefits
- Inadequate education system linkages to private sector needs (K-12,
Higher Ed)
- Gaps between workforce development programs/funding and business/indiv.
needs
- Personal obstacles (drugs, child care, transp’n)
- Telework training
|
|
63
|
- Create linkages between business and schools to address skill
deficiencies
- Pursue more flexible workforce training funding for employers and
displaced workers
- Deliver training via IT and outreach
- Use Workforce Investment Boards as funding partners
- Convene regional health care summit to discuss workforce issues
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
- Highly Legitimized & Credible
- Shared Power – Federal/State/Tribal
- Flexible to Focus on Inland Northwest Issues
- Targeted to Distressed Areas
- Encourages collaboration, avoids duplication
- Leverages Other Grants
- Modest, but Relatively Stable Funding
|
|
66
|
- Other Commissions Poverty-Oriented
- Socio-Economic Impact of Federal Policies
- Building a Regional Political Coalition
- Engaging the Bush Administration
- Remaining Locally-Driven
- Lower Funding Levels than Northwest Timber Initiative
|
|
67
|
- Variation of regional commission concept
- Regional Certification Team (similar to Northwest Economic Adjustment
Initiative in western WA, OR and N. California)
- Partner with another existing regional organization(s), such as PNWER
|
|
68
|
- Refine Strategy:
- Feedback from stakeholders (like MEDA)
- Identify & prioritize regional programs/initiatives, opportunities
for immediate action/collaboration
- Determine performance measures
- Review organization options (e.g., regional commission, other)
- Gain support from state and federal elected officials
- Seek federal and foundation funding
- Implement actions, track results
|
|
69
|
- Join the INEAS Advisory Committee
- Help us identify programs/projects that are best practices and should be
replicated in the region
- Encourage our Congressional delegation, Governors, and tribal leaders to
support INEAS and work together as a regional coalition
|
|
70
|
- www.inlandnwregion.org
- The Hingston Roach Group, Inc. 208-983-2175
- Lorraine Roach lroach@thrgroup.com
- Ruth Mohr rmohr@thrgroup.com
- Bootstrap Solutions 208-859-8878
- Dick Gardner bootstrap1@msn.com
- James A. Birdsall & Assoc. 208-859-0730
- Jim Birdsall jbirds@fmtc.com
|